| Donald Joule |
| Junior |

|
 |
| Data inscrierii: 26/Mar/2026 |
| Mesaje: 5 |
|
|
|
 |
Clearly the mistaken action by the [url=https://www.helmetfw.com/product-category/lego-ferrari/]lego ferrari[/url] admin touched a deeper nerve, no? Precisely so, Doug. As I understand it, Bebe posted something in EoST, whereupon some undisclosed Admin summarily deleted it and unceremoniously blocked Bebe, erroneously believing it was spam. P said that's all he knew; he didn't even know which of 11 Admins it was. But according to P , whoever it was did not believe it was an error to have deleted Bebe's post and to have summarily blocked her.
As near as I can tell, this one admin departed from the tip that P and the other admins would have employed. As I understand it, this lone rogue admin unilaterally determined that it was correct to summarily boot Bebe out of the EoST and does not repent o [url=https://www.helmetfw.com/product-category/building-blocks/]building blocks[/url] f that belief. It's unclear to me how this lack of consensus among the Admins can be resolved. It may be too late for Bebe, but it means that this phenomenon is likely to recur, perhaps with another would-be contributor in the future.
I don't kno [url=https://www.helmetfw.com/product-category/action-figure/]action figure[/url] w that we'll resolve this issue here, but I submit that the political decision not to bear accurate witness is inconsistent with the fundamental tenets of cybernetic systems theory. As I understand it at this juncture, Bebe lost faith in the culture of systems thinking because it morphed from science to politics, and that departure introduced what she calls a "darkness" (and I call a corruption) of the fundamental tenets of systems science and systems thinking.
Bebe , in her E-Mail to me, expressly decried the absence of an empathic human response [url=https://www.helmetfw.com/product-category/toyark/]toyark[/url] . That created a dilemma for me, because P was unable to provide the autentic context, so I had no useful information on what happened to cause Bebe to feel betrayed and wounded. P could similarly see no reason for Bebe to be angry at him. But after I shared with him a bit more information, P did see why her anger was directed at him. In other words, the failure to share relevant information blocks the possibility of empathy. If having and expressing empathy is the ultimate goal, then concealing information is anathema to that goal.
As I see it, the community of systems thinkers have splintered into two discernible factions. The smaller faction, to which you and I subscribe, is that we employ the axiomatic principles and tools for thought of systems thinking to solve both systemic problems "out there" in the world at large, as well as systemic problems that arise within the corridors of our own discipline and practices. Moreover we d [url=https://www.helmetfw.com/product-category/little-tikes-car/]little tikes car[/url] o our work in public, so as to demonstrate that we are role models for our methodology even when we are addressing internal issues within our own community.
The brutality is built right into the platform (as well as other social media platforms) and it can spill over into reality in terrible, evil ways. Consider the Rohingya genocide in Myanmar. This genocide used Facebook to incite terrible, brutal violence in the real world. The New York Times conducted an in-depth investigation of this genocide and reported what they found in this article [url=https://www.helmetfw.com/product/lego-ferrari/][img]https://www.helmetfw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/lego-ferrari-534cab-247x296.png[/img][/url] : A Genocide Incited on Facebook, With Posts From Myanmar's Military |
|